davidc wrote:I think the biggest question in all of this is "Will Mike be getting the 7D2?", considering it looks to be quite a capable piece of kit
That's an interesting question. There are two reasons why I have not being buying Canon equipment for the past two or three years. Apart from already having the lenses I need, Canon has not provided any incentive to update my camera. I have not felt the lure of full frame, which only offers what I consider to be marginal benefits, and Canon has left its APS-C offerings in a time warp for the past five years while others have moved on. We will not officially know the spec of the 7D2 until 5 September when the NDA expires, so it remains to be seen whether Canon will finally be embracing new technology or the 7D2 is just another lukewarm upgrade. My view is that it will need to do the former in order to remain competitive in the long term.
The second reason for reluctance to invest in DSLRs is weight and bulk, as I have said here before. Most of the time I am out and about, I am shooting on m43 mainly using consumer level gear which is actually very capable for most of my purposes, but without the size and weight penalties. At present, I am more likely to buy an Olympus E-M1 than a 7D2. That I have not done so is mainly down to a reluctance to make a substantial investment in a system which does not yet match the capacity of my DSLR. I have considered selling my Canon gear to fund the purchase of m43 equipment, but so far have not been prepared to make the sacrifice that would entail.
If the 7D2 really is as good as everyone seems to predict, that would present a dilemma as I do not expect m43 to have anything comparable at least until next year, which is the earliest that an E-M1 successor is likely to appear. That said, I think that the 7D2 will have to be something really special to overcome my concerns about regularly carrying camera and lenses which are bulky and heavy. I suspect that for the moment I will be keeping my powder dry and sticking with what I have got.