Lunch With Leica
Posted: Wed 26 Nov 2014, 15:32
I have just come back from an event at Park Cameras in London which was billed as "Lunch With Leica". Technically, I suppose that the title is correct as there was lunch and there were Leicas to look at, although not the full range, but no one actually from Leica so far as I could tell.
Less excusable was the lack of knowledge on the part of the staff. The Panasonic LX100 and Leica D-Lux are essentially the same camera*, with what are mainly cosmetic differences and maybe each company has its own processing for JPEGs. Asked about the difference between the two, the sales person claimed that it was the lens. Apparently the Panasonic has a faux Leica optic, whereas the Leica camera has a genuine one. OK, very funny, what's the real answer. That was the "real" answer apparently and he did not know whether Raw file output was the same for both cameras. It was a similar situation with the Leica M, which was all a bit of a mystery to the first person I spoke to. Even the "expert" could not answer all my questions.
A couple of years ago Leica had a big shake out of its dealers, dropping quite a few who could or would not meet their requirements, and appeared to be going up market. Back then, Leica could sell everything it made, but has since increased production in its new manufacturing facility. It now seems that the company is going back to a position where anyone can sell them. Even Jessops stocks them. Based on my experience today, it's not unlike buying a Rolls Royce from a Ford dealer.
* Possibly the most important difference is that the Panasonic has a grip on the front of the camera with is lacking on the D-Lux and the LX100's thumb grip is bigger. I would save my money and forego the red dot if I were buying.
Less excusable was the lack of knowledge on the part of the staff. The Panasonic LX100 and Leica D-Lux are essentially the same camera*, with what are mainly cosmetic differences and maybe each company has its own processing for JPEGs. Asked about the difference between the two, the sales person claimed that it was the lens. Apparently the Panasonic has a faux Leica optic, whereas the Leica camera has a genuine one. OK, very funny, what's the real answer. That was the "real" answer apparently and he did not know whether Raw file output was the same for both cameras. It was a similar situation with the Leica M, which was all a bit of a mystery to the first person I spoke to. Even the "expert" could not answer all my questions.
A couple of years ago Leica had a big shake out of its dealers, dropping quite a few who could or would not meet their requirements, and appeared to be going up market. Back then, Leica could sell everything it made, but has since increased production in its new manufacturing facility. It now seems that the company is going back to a position where anyone can sell them. Even Jessops stocks them. Based on my experience today, it's not unlike buying a Rolls Royce from a Ford dealer.
* Possibly the most important difference is that the Panasonic has a grip on the front of the camera with is lacking on the D-Lux and the LX100's thumb grip is bigger. I would save my money and forego the red dot if I were buying.