Imaging Resource Review of the Year
Posted: Tue 23 Dec 2014, 09:07
Everyone is doing it, but if you want to know what IR reckons is the best kit introduced during the year then it is in the course of publishing a seriesof articles.
First up, entry level cameras:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/20 ... as-of-2014
I can endorse its recommendation for the Olympus E-M10. True, its big brother E-M1 has has better image stabilisation, weather proofing and better AF (allegedly, I did not find it worked particularly well when I tested it), but image quality is the same and I prefer the E-M10's controls and more compact dimensions. The optional grip is well designed and improves the handling. I was at the Leica store in Mayfair the other day and put my E-M10 with a Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 next to the new Leica D-Lux (actually a Panasonic LX100 in a cosmetically different body) and the two were more or less identical in size. Even the salesman was surprised and impressed. True, the E-M10 bulks up when other lenses are attached as they do not retract like the fixed one on the PanaLeica, but I know which option I would prefer.
First up, entry level cameras:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/20 ... as-of-2014
I can endorse its recommendation for the Olympus E-M10. True, its big brother E-M1 has has better image stabilisation, weather proofing and better AF (allegedly, I did not find it worked particularly well when I tested it), but image quality is the same and I prefer the E-M10's controls and more compact dimensions. The optional grip is well designed and improves the handling. I was at the Leica store in Mayfair the other day and put my E-M10 with a Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 next to the new Leica D-Lux (actually a Panasonic LX100 in a cosmetically different body) and the two were more or less identical in size. Even the salesman was surprised and impressed. True, the E-M10 bulks up when other lenses are attached as they do not retract like the fixed one on the PanaLeica, but I know which option I would prefer.