Iggy wrote:Is it worth going to see the Fuji X-T2 @ some £1400 for the body alone, to sit in a crowded Park Camera room?
Well, I did get a free memory card out of it.
Why not look at it the other way? I now have a couple of superseded Fuji bodies with the 16 megapixel X-Trans sensor which is still current in some of the company's cameras, both bought at bargain basement prices due to their age. On Saturday, keen to demonstrate what Fuji cameras can do, Wayne Johns showed us some large prints made with the older sensor as he did not have sufficient prints from the newer models with the 24 MP one. Most people would be challenged to tell the difference, I would suggest.
The X-T1 was/is a well respected camera and there is no doubt that the X-T2 improves on it in the same way that the X-Pro2 is a step up from the X-Pro1. In fact, given the latter's flaws, quite possibly more so. I like the Fuji cameras and lenses, as they give me what I get my DSLR (sometimes more) without the same bulk. Even the X-Pro1 performs well enough for me in most circumstances. Given that the same sensors tend to get used in a range of models, it is perfectly feasible to get good results with a quality lens on an inexpensive body. I have been doing that for years. In the example you yourself give, it is not always necessary to spend top dollar. If I want the new sensor, it will probably be made available in one or more budget models next year.
So was Saturday's event really worth it? I was going up to town anyway, I got to take pictures of an attractive model and heckle a top photographer. I also tried out some Fuji cameras and lenses, plus I came away knowing I do not urgently need the latest gear. Not to mention the free memory card. What's not to like?