POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Post pictures you simply want to share with others. (Use "Image Critique" if you want to obtain feedback.)
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Postby Mike Farley » Mon 10 Oct 2016, 22:24

For more about this image, see my blog post http://lightintotheshadows.proimageblog ... eview=true.
Attachments
Buachaille Etive Mor.jpg
Buachaille Etive Mor
Buachaille Etive Mor.jpg (97.05 KiB) Viewed 3530 times
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)
User avatar
Nina
Posts: 386
Joined: Fri 17 Aug 2012, 22:16
Location: London
Contact:

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Postby Nina » Wed 12 Oct 2016, 10:19

classic view. You seem to be lucky with the weather Mike.
Regards

Nina

Check out my latest work
On www.pbase.com/ninaludwig
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Postby Mike Farley » Wed 12 Oct 2016, 19:10

Nina wrote:classic view. You seem to be lucky with the weather Mike.

We were there in the morning when the light was perfect for bring out all the shapes and textures in the mountain.

If you look on my blog, I have an infrared version of the same scene. It turns out that infrared works well with mountains. 8-)
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)
User avatar
Peter Boughton
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed 22 Aug 2012, 13:35
Contact:

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Postby Peter Boughton » Sun 16 Oct 2016, 14:07

Meh. I think my photo of it is WAY better...

DSC_5205.jpg
DSC_5205.jpg (243.69 KiB) Viewed 3502 times


;)
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Postby Mike Farley » Mon 17 Oct 2016, 08:48

Peter Boughton wrote:Meh. I think my photo of it is WAY better...

I cannot think of any way in which that shot can be improved. ;)
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)
User avatar
Peter Boughton
Posts: 335
Joined: Wed 22 Aug 2012, 13:35
Contact:

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Postby Peter Boughton » Wed 26 Oct 2016, 23:12

Is that a challenge? :P

Reducing the exposure until it's pitch black would be one way, though I am tempted to put it into a competition as is, just to see if a judge is brave enough to give it the mark it deserves...

That'd be what... one point for the camera being the right way up, another because of the small bit of blue sky, and maybe being generous and giving one more because if you squint real hard you don't notice the incredibly dirty sensor? Don't think I've seen an image get 3 before. :D
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Postby Mike Farley » Thu 27 Oct 2016, 10:27

Peter Boughton wrote:Is that a challenge? :P

It was intended to be ambiguous. It could just be that you have achieved perfection. 8-)

Peter Boughton wrote:...... I am tempted to put it into a competition as is, just to see if a judge is brave enough to give it the mark it deserves...

Technical faults are catnip to many judges as it gives them an excuse to mark down an otherwise satisfactory image. In fact I know of a few who will even resort to inventing such issues so that they can justify a low mark. A judge ought to award a 12 simply for allowing them so much opportunity to let rip. ;)

Peter Boughton wrote:Don't think I've seen an image get 3 before.

I have. Some years ago someone submitted an admittedly indifferent shot which consisted of just two tones, black and white. The judge was unequivocal and to the point:

"You're in the Advanced Class. You know better than this. Three."

If the challenge is to go low, it might just have got harder. You will be needing a brave judge. :lol:
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)

Return to “Photo Sharing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests