POTD 22 May 2009 - Assisi

Post pictures you simply want to share with others. (Use "Image Critique" if you want to obtain feedback.)
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

POTD 22 May 2009 - Assisi

Postby Mike Farley » Fri 06 Mar 2015, 10:04

No, the date is not a typo, this shot really was taken nearly six years ago and depicts the church of St Francis at Assisi. I took it shortly after dawn to get the early morning light and avoid the crowds which assemble later in the day. As you will imagine, it is a popular destination and gets busy.

So why has it taken so long to make an appearance? At the time, I could not get a result in post processing which I was happy with. Back then, we were still using the original version of Adobe Camera Raw and it has had two major updates in the intervening period. I also now have Silver Efex Pro 2 which I find very effective for mono conversions. It just goes to show that as software improves, it is worth revisiting older images as it might be possible to obtain a better result than was possible initially. The other thing which has changed, of course, is me. I now have more experience in processing images and am better able to realise my original vision.
Attachments
Assisi.jpg
The church of St Francis at Assisi
Assisi.jpg (118.39 KiB) Viewed 574 times
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)
User avatar
davidc
Posts: 2410
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2012, 11:27
Location: location, location.
Contact:

Re: POTD 22 May 2009 - Assisi

Postby davidc » Sun 08 Mar 2015, 09:34

I think the mono conversion suits it but in doing so you've lost the effect of the early morning sky :)
Check out my website - davidcandlish.photography
My Top 50 album is here
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

Re: POTD 22 May 2009 - Assisi

Postby Mike Farley » Sun 08 Mar 2015, 11:37

davidc wrote:I think the mono conversion suits it but in doing so you've lost the effect of the early morning sky :)


I understand what you are saying, but I am not sure that I am really in agreement. I was at the location before dawn, but there were no lighting fireworks and this shot was taken around 15 minutes after sunrise. The problem is that there is no drama in the sky, although the small patch of cloud around the cross at the top of the church is a bonus, and the colours of the scene are limited. My view is that mono is bringing out the light on the church and the contrast with the statue which is still in the shade. It is also brings out the textures in the grass. Maybe this shot would have worked better in colour at another time of the year rather than late spring when climatic conditions and the effect of the sun were probably working against me. That's something I am unlikely ever to know.

For comparison, this is how the shot looked after the Raw conversion in Lightroom 5, before I created the mono image using Silver Efex Pro 2. I could have boosted the Vibrance and/or Saturation for the Raw file processing, which would have warmed the tones on the church, had I not decided to go for monochrome. It's an interesting discussion, so I would like to know people's views having now seen both images.
Attachments
Assisi - Colour.jpg
Assisi - colour version
Assisi - Colour.jpg (121.14 KiB) Viewed 562 times
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)

Return to “Photo Sharing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests