Page 1 of 1

Focus stacking

Posted: Mon 15 Jun 2015, 12:54
by gcluer
Adrian Davies mentioned Focus Stacking. I didn't know you could do it from Photoshop but attached is a photo I processed in Helicon Focus from a stack of photos taken at different focus settings. The rust gall is on the leaf of a pear tree and is about 1 or 2 mm across.

Re: Focus stacking

Posted: Mon 15 Jun 2015, 14:11
by Mike Farley
Thanks for sharing, Graham. How many images did you take and how long did Helicon Focus take to process them?

One thing which your image does show and is something which Adrian Davies himself remarked on as he had done the same in one of his examples, is taking enough shots to ensure that every part of the subject is in focus. The differentiation between the sharp and blurred areas in a conventional image comprising a single shot is much more gradual than in a focus stacked one, where the change can be quite abrupt and looks abnormal. Of course, that is all down to perception as having any part of a scene out of focus can hardly be described as natural.

Re: Focus stacking

Posted: Thu 18 Jun 2015, 08:06
by Nina
You produced a fascinating image Graham. I wonder if I would have enough patience to do the image stacking though, even if my old PC could cope with the strain. :lol:

Re: Focus stacking

Posted: Mon 22 Jun 2015, 18:53
by GrahamL
Hi Graham,

Is amazingly detailed indeed! What was the lens setup?

GrahamL

Re: Focus stacking

Posted: Wed 24 Jun 2015, 16:32
by gcluer
Canon 7D with Canon 60 mm macro lens.

Helicon focus does all the work changing the focus in increments.

Re: Focus stacking

Posted: Wed 24 Jun 2015, 19:13
by Mike Farley
gcluer wrote:
Helicon focus does all the work changing the focus in increments.


Does this mean that you Were using a motorised focussing rail?

Re: Focus stacking

Posted: Mon 17 Aug 2015, 11:08
by gcluer
No. The camera to subject distance was fixed and Helicon Focus altered the focus setting of the lens in increments.

Re: Focus stacking

Posted: Mon 17 Aug 2015, 11:34
by Mike Farley
gcluer wrote:No. The camera to subject distance was fixed and Helicon Focus altered the focus setting of the lens in increments.

Neat. Presumably that means that the camera was tethered?