Page 1 of 1

POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Posted: Mon 10 Oct 2016, 22:24
by Mike Farley
For more about this image, see my blog post http://lightintotheshadows.proimageblog ... eview=true.

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Posted: Wed 12 Oct 2016, 10:19
by Nina
classic view. You seem to be lucky with the weather Mike.

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Posted: Wed 12 Oct 2016, 19:10
by Mike Farley
Nina wrote:classic view. You seem to be lucky with the weather Mike.

We were there in the morning when the light was perfect for bring out all the shapes and textures in the mountain.

If you look on my blog, I have an infrared version of the same scene. It turns out that infrared works well with mountains. 8-)

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Posted: Sun 16 Oct 2016, 14:07
by Peter Boughton
Meh. I think my photo of it is WAY better...

DSC_5205.jpg
DSC_5205.jpg (243.69 KiB) Viewed 3515 times


;)

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Posted: Mon 17 Oct 2016, 08:48
by Mike Farley
Peter Boughton wrote:Meh. I think my photo of it is WAY better...

I cannot think of any way in which that shot can be improved. ;)

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Posted: Wed 26 Oct 2016, 23:12
by Peter Boughton
Is that a challenge? :P

Reducing the exposure until it's pitch black would be one way, though I am tempted to put it into a competition as is, just to see if a judge is brave enough to give it the mark it deserves...

That'd be what... one point for the camera being the right way up, another because of the small bit of blue sky, and maybe being generous and giving one more because if you squint real hard you don't notice the incredibly dirty sensor? Don't think I've seen an image get 3 before. :D

Re: POTD 10 October 2016 - Buachaille Etive Mor

Posted: Thu 27 Oct 2016, 10:27
by Mike Farley
Peter Boughton wrote:Is that a challenge? :P

It was intended to be ambiguous. It could just be that you have achieved perfection. 8-)

Peter Boughton wrote:...... I am tempted to put it into a competition as is, just to see if a judge is brave enough to give it the mark it deserves...

Technical faults are catnip to many judges as it gives them an excuse to mark down an otherwise satisfactory image. In fact I know of a few who will even resort to inventing such issues so that they can justify a low mark. A judge ought to award a 12 simply for allowing them so much opportunity to let rip. ;)

Peter Boughton wrote:Don't think I've seen an image get 3 before.

I have. Some years ago someone submitted an admittedly indifferent shot which consisted of just two tones, black and white. The judge was unequivocal and to the point:

"You're in the Advanced Class. You know better than this. Three."

If the challenge is to go low, it might just have got harder. You will be needing a brave judge. :lol: