Dartmoor Websites

General discussion and anything that isn't covered by the other categories.
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

Dartmoor Websites

Postby Mike Farley » Sat 06 Sep 2014, 14:37

Following on from my talk at Chairman's Evening about my experiences of shooting landscape photography on Dartmoor, these are the main websites I looked at beforehand to get an idea of suitable locations.


I also used Google Images to look at shots, but not flickr which tends to give a lot of indifferent results and a lot of effort is needed to winnow out the chaff. With Google, if you see an image you like, it is straightforward to click through to the website where it is hosted to see if there is any more information.
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)
User avatar
davidc
Posts: 2410
Joined: Wed 12 Sep 2012, 11:27
Location: location, location.
Contact:

Re: Dartmoor Websites

Postby davidc » Sun 07 Sep 2014, 06:12

The basic flickr search is definitely somewhat random. The search sorted by Interestingness is generally a lot better.

https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=dar ... gness-desc

Beware though, there are a few... peculiar.... images in there, potentially not safe for work and showing the even the Interestingness algorithm can get things wrong :)
Check out my website - davidcandlish.photography
My Top 50 album is here
Mike Farley
Posts: 7316
Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
Contact:

Re: Dartmoor Websites

Postby Mike Farley » Sun 07 Sep 2014, 12:35

davidc wrote:The basic flickr search is definitely somewhat random. The search sorted by Interestingness is generally a lot better.

https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=dar ... gness-desc

Beware though, there are a few... peculiar.... images in there, potentially not safe for work and showing the even the Interestingness algorithm can get things wrong :)


Thanks, Dave. I had not seen the "Interestingness" filter before, although admittedly I am not that into flickr and its functions. I agree that while the filter does return a better set of images, not all the locations are given which does reduce its usefulness a tad. Still, another useful resource, though on balance I still prefer Google Images with its links to websites.
Regards

Mike Farley
(Visit my website and blog - www.mikefarley.net)

Return to “General”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests