Sorry, guys, it's on Lula.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/techn ... teps.shtml
Astrophotography Article
-
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
- Contact:
- Paul Heester
- Posts: 622
- Joined: Fri 18 Jan 2013, 13:16
Re: Astrophotography Article
I skimmed the contents but his costs seem astronomical (pun intended). He is using a $6000 lens on a $8500 medium format camera using a $3000 rig!!!!!!!!!
Whilst I do appreciate the night sky from a photography point of view I prefer some earth-bound foreground interest, which can be achieved MUCH cheaper.
Whilst I do appreciate the night sky from a photography point of view I prefer some earth-bound foreground interest, which can be achieved MUCH cheaper.
-
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
- Contact:
Re: Astrophotography Article
I only posted because I know that there are a few people in the club with an interest in the subject. Not knowing too much about it myself, I thought that there might be some learnings. Reichmann is using the Pentax 645z because he has one and likes it, but I would be most surprised if other cameras could not be used. Also, he thought about the $6,000 lens, but opted for something different, bought secondhand on eBay for half that amount. That leaves the tracking device, but presumably there are cheaper options - hand guiding even, and various other bits of hardware. The software he mentions seems reasonably priced.
I do agree that photographing just the heavens will not be for everyone, but those who do enjoy the activity will probably have at least some of the kit already.
I do agree that photographing just the heavens will not be for everyone, but those who do enjoy the activity will probably have at least some of the kit already.
Re: Astrophotography Article
You can do it an absolute ton cheaper than what he's proposing. Madness.
-
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
- Contact:
Re: Astrophotography Article
davidc wrote:You can do it an absolute ton cheaper than what he's proposing. Madness.
Tax deductable, presumably.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests