There is yet another pretender to the throne, someone else has come up with a better alternative to JPEG. No doubt to go the way of its predecessors, none of which you will have heard of. Probably.
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/035065 ... lace-jpegs
Here We Go Again
-
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
- Contact:
Re: Here We Go Again
BPG doesn't role off the tongue as well as JPEG! Apart from that is looks interesting and has possibilities but it has a long way to go to snatch the crown from jpeg.
Regards
David A Beard.
David A Beard.
-
- Posts: 7316
- Joined: Tue 11 Sep 2012, 16:38
- Contact:
Re: Here We Go Again
davidb wrote:BPG ....... looks interesting and has possibilities but it has a long way to go to snatch the crown from jpeg.
Quite agree. JPEG is ubiquitous and is good enough for most folk, who do not realise that it was orginally designed to minimise file size at the expense of image quality. That was an important consideraion back in the day when disk space was expensive and bandwidth limited, but not any more.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests